Acts Chapter Eight
Read Acts 8:1-2
v1. “AND SAUL WAS CONSENTING UNTO HIS DEATH. AND AT THAT TIME THERE WAS A GREAT
PERSECUTION AGAINST THE CHURCH WHICH WAS AT
We’re introduced for the first time to Saul, or as we know him later the Apostle Paul. He held or guarded the garments of those who stoned Stephen:
Acts
When he is arrested after returning from his third missionary journey; Paul tells us of that occasion as an example of his prior commitment to the purposes of those who now wanted to kill him as well:
Acts
As a result
of this persecution the thousands of Christians that were in
Acts
If they had
stayed at
v2. “AND DEVOUT MEN CARRIED STEPHEN to his burial, AND MADE GREAT LAMENTATION OVER HIM.”
We’re told that “DEVOUT MEN” carried Stephen, what does the word devout mean? Vine - “pious, reverencing God, realizing the presence and power or claims of God”. Men dedicated to God, men who admired and loved Stephen, men who made “great lamentation over him.” What does that word mean? In the original Greek this is the only use of this particular word in the New Testament that we find. It literally means “to beat on the breast” and indicates the great love held for Stephen and the mourning that occurred because of his death.
Read Acts 8:3-4
v3. “AS FOR SAUL, HE MADE HAVOCK OF THE CHURCH, ENTERING INTO EVERY HOUSE, AND HALING MEN AND WOMEN COMMITTED them TO PRISON.”
The Sanhedrin now have lost their fear of the people haven’t they? They also have lost their fear of creating a situation where they would be inviting the intervention of the Roman civil government. Why? Because they executed a man and there was no backlash that is recorded. Why? Again God is executing his plan, through his providence and the general nature of people.
Did this great sin ever haunt Paul’s memory later?
I Corinthians 15:9 “FOR I AM THE LEAST OF THE
APOSTLES, THAT AM NOT MEET TO BE CALLED AN APOSTLE, BECAUSE I PERSECUTED THE
Yes, and we have a tendency, even though we know that our sins are totally forgiven, blotted out, erased from God’s book of our lives, to remember and sometimes let that bother us. Paul wasn’t any different. But he also tells us that he obtained the mercy of God and why.
I Timothy
What does this tell us about sin committed in ignorance? That, when repented of , God will readily forgive. Conversely what does this also tell us about willful sin? What does it tell us about willfully doing what it unrighteous or not right in the sight of God, knowing that its wrong?
Hebrews 10:26-27 “26For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of
the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, 27But a
certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall
devour the adversaries.”
v4. “THEREFORE THEY THAT WERE SCATTERED ABROAD WENT EVERY WHERE PREACHING THE WORD.”
The people from all those nations that were represented are now prepared and the situation has been generated, again just as God had planned, to scatter them back to their homelands and even other Jews that were from Jerusalem out into other areas. And they went preaching and teaching the word, just as Jesus had commanded his disciples:
Matthew
When they
persecute you in one city, go to another and continue to preach and teach. So through the providence of God, something
that would seem to those directly affected a great calamity is used to bring
salvation to the world. That is exactly what Paul did when he was persecuted,
didn’t he? When he was persecuted in
Read Acts 8:5-8
v5. “THEN PHILIP WENT DOWN TO THE CITY OF
This is Philip
the evangelist, one of those appointed to serve the Greciasn
widows and one who now has left
It says he preached Christ unto
them, were these people Jews? God has not
included the Gentiles people yet. The
Samaritans were a mixture of the ten northern tribes of
v6. “AND THE PEOPLE WITH ONE ACCORD GAVE HEED UNTO THOSE THINGS WHICH PHILIP SPAKE, HEARING AND SEEING THE MIRACLES WHICH HE DID.”
Now these
people had probably heard about what had happened in
v7. “FOR UNCLEAN SPIRITS, CRYING WITH LOUD VOICE, CAME OUT OF MANY THAT WERE POSSESSED with them: AND MANY TAKEN WITH PALSIES, AND THAT WERE LAME, WERE HEALED.”
What common characteristic do we have of these miracles? They couldn’t be denied. Unclean spirits were removed, sometimes literally kicking and screaming, from people and we talked about these spirits during our study of the Satan that we conducted. There were others taken of palsies, what is that? We most often relate it to actual physical, uncontrolled shaking, and those that were lame, perhaps even as the man at the gate of temple, not having been able to walk for their entire lives or for many years.
v8. “AND THERE WAS GREAT JOY IN THAT CITY.”
Why would
there have been such joy in
Read Acts 8:9-13
v9. “BUT THERE WAS A CERTAIN MAN, CALLED SIMON,
WHICH BEFORETIME IN THE SAME CITY USED SORCERY, AND BEWITCHED THE PEOPLE OF
What kind of a man was this Simon? He was a deceiver wasn’t he? He was like those Gamaliel spoke of wasn’t he?
Acts 5:36 “FOR BEFORE THESE DAYS ROSE UP THEUDAS, BOASTING HIMSELF TO BE SOMEBODY; TO WHOM A NUMBER OF MEN, ABOUT FOUR HUNDRED, JOINED THEMSELVES: WHO WAS SLAIN; AND ALL, AS MANY AS OBEYED HIM, WERE SCATTERED, AND BROUGHT TO NOUGHT.”
He deceived
the people by tricks and other deceptions, much like a magician would. The people of
v10. “TO WHOM THEY ALL GAVE HEED, FROM THE LEAST TO THE GREATEST, SAYING, THIS MAN IS THE GREAT POWER OF GOD.”
Simon had been successful hadn’t he? In the practice of his magic, his sorcery he was held highly by from the “LEAST TO THE GREATEST”. They having heard of the power of Jesus; gave God the credit for Simon’s power as well. Consequently they thought that he was someone sent from God, spoke for God, when actually he was simply an opportunist, taking advantage of people just like our televangelists do today.
v11. “AND TO HIM THEY HAD REGARD, BECAUSE THAT OF LONG TIME HE HAD BEWITCHED THEM WITH SOCERIES.”
So Simon had worked his magic and lead these people to believe him for some time hadn’t he?
v12. “BUT WHEN THEY BELEIVED
PHILIP PREACHING THE THINGS CONCERING THE
Now the
people of
v13. “THEN SIMON HIMSELF BELIEVED ALSO: AND WHEN HE WAS BAPTIZED, HE CONTINUED WITH PHILIP, AND WONDERED, BEHOLDING THE MIRACLES AND SIGNS WHICH WERE DONE.”
This man had been deceiving people for years perhaps, for some time at least, and now he meets up with the real thing. We could even suppose that he may have followed Philip around just to try to see how he was doing all these things. After all, what he knew was deception and trickery, now he was seeing something real and was fascinated by it. Was there any difference between the belief of Simon and the other people who believed? Not that the scripture tells us, in fact it uses the same words and implies the same kind of belief. But even though Simon had believed and had been baptized, he still has a heart problem, doesn’t he?
Read Acts 8:14-25
v14
“NOW WHEN THE APOSTLES WHICH
WERE AT
Even though
many of the
v15. “WHO, WHEN THEY WERE COME DOWN, PRAYED FOR THEM, THAT THEY MIGHT RECEIVE THE HOLY GHOST:”
Peter and John prays for these Samaritan christians, bringing a petition to God that they should receive the Holy Ghost. Why would they need this kind of support? They had no New Testaments, the new covenant of God with mankind had not yet been written down, they needed guidance.
v16. “(FOR AS YET HE WAS FALLEN UPON NONE OF THEM: ONLY THEY WERE BAPTIZED IN THE NAME OF THE LORD JESUS.”)
The great commission had been exercised:
Matthew 28:19 “GO YE THEREFORE, AND TEACH ALL NATIONS,
BAPTIZING THEM IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER, AND OF THE SON, AND OF THE HOLY
GHOST:”
but these people did not receive the power of the Holy Ghost as a gift did they? Does this help us understand what the scripture means:
Acts
Controversy has always existed on the exact meaning of “YE SHALL RECEIVE THE GIFT OF THE HOLY GHOST.” in this verse. However, we can point out that when the Samaritan people were baptized they did not receive any special power or blessing beyond their salvation, and neither do we. These apostles are about to teach us the only way that the power of the Holy Spirit was provided. Only Jesus, the apostles and the household of Cornelius received the Holy Spirit directly from God. Jesus as the Son of God, the apostles to permit them to do the work they needed to do, Cornelius and his household to confirm or verify that Gentiles were fit subjects for God’s kingdom. Everyone else was provided that power only by the laying on of the hands of an apostle.
v17. “THEN LAID THEY their HANDS ON THEM, AND THEY RECEIVED THE HOLY GHOST.”
This laying on of hands did not occur on Pentecost neither did it occur in the case of Cornelius in Acts 10. When Paul taught the Ephesians how where they granted the power of the Holy Spirit?
Acts 19:6 “AND WHEN PAUL HAD LAID his HANDS UPON THEM, THE HOLY GHOST CAME ON THEM; AND THEY SPAKE WITH TONGUES, AND PROPHESIED.”
This then is the true knowledge about how the power of the Holy Spirit was received and who received it. Was it a complicated piece of knowledge that only the well versed or highly educated of that day could understand? Should it be today?
Hebrews 6:1-2 ‘THEREFORE LEAVING THE PRINCIPLES OF THE DOCTRINE OF CHRIST, LET US GO ON UNTO PERFECTION; NOT LAYING AGAIN THE FOUNDATION OF REPENTANCE FROM DEAD WORKS, AND OF FAITH TOWARD GOD, OF THE DOCTRINE OF BAPTISMS, AND OF LAYING ON OF HANDS, AND OF RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD, AND OF ETERNAL JUDGMENT.”
What do we commonly call those items the Hebrew writer is talking about here? First principles, the basic teaching that we are to grow or mature beyond in His service.
v18. “AND WHEN SIMON SAW THAT THROUGH LAYING ON OF THE APOSTLES’ HANDS THE HOLY GHOST WAS GIVEN, HE OFFERED THEM MONEY,”
You remember that Simon was amazed by the power displayed by Philip. He had claimed something similar and fooled a lot of people. He was converted to Christ and baptized but he still had some of his old ways didn’t he? He hadn’t outgrown greed or the lust for power. He now knew how this power was transmitted from person to person, he wanted some and offered Peter and John money to give it to him.
v19. “SAYING, GIVE ME ALSO THIS POWER, THAT ON WHOMSOEVER I LAY HANDS, HE MAY RECEIVE THE HOLY GHOST.”
He not only wanted the power that Philip had, he wanted the full measure of an apostle so that he could pass this power on to other people. Now that would be a lucrative business wouldn’t it? Peter’s reaction is not what Simon expects is it?
v20. “BUT PETER SAID UNTO HIM, THY MONEY PERISH WITH THEE, BECAUSE THOU HAST THOUGHT THAT THE GIFT OF GOD MAY BE PURCHASED WITH MONEY.”
The commentator says that Peter was filled with “holy and righteous indignation”. He rebuked Simon, rebuked him strongly, because he thought that “THE GIFT OF GOD MAY BE PURCHASED WITH MONEY.” What did Jesus tell his disciples when he sent them out on the limited commission?
Matthew 10:8 “HEAL THE SICK, CLEANSE THE LEPERS, RAISE THE DEAD, CAST OUT DEVILS:
FREELY YE HAVE RECEIVED, FREELY GIVE.”
It was not to be sold, it could not be sold, even if Peter were of a mind to do so, it could not be purchased with money. Neither can our salvation today.
v21. “THOU HAST NEITHER PART NOR
Then he tells him that since his heart isn’t right in God’s sight, that he can have no part in this matter at all.
v22. “REPENT THEREFORE OF THIS THY WICKEDNESS, AND PRAY GOD, IF PERHAPS THE THOUGHT OF THINE HEART MAY BE FORGIVEN THEE.”
Peter tells him to repent and pray God for forgiveness. What is the formula for baptized believers who sin today? Absolutely the same thing, repent and pray, simple isn’t it? Repentance is not a new instruction is it? nor uncommon. Nebuchadnezzar was told:
Daniel 4:27 “WHEREFORE, O KING, LET MY COUNSEL BE ACCEPTABLE UNTO THEE, AND BREAK OFF THY SINS BY RIGHTEOUSNESS, AND THINE INIQUITIES BY SHOWING MERCY TO THE POOR; IF IT MAY BE A LENGTHING OF THY TRANQUILLITY.”
And elders of the church are instructed to give this advice as well:
II Timothy 2:25-26 “IN MEEKNESS INSTRUCTING THOSE THAT OPPOSE THEMSELVES; IF GOD PERADVENTURE WILL GIVE THEM REPENTANCE TO THE ACKNOWLEDING OF THE TRUTH; AND that THEY MAY RECOVER THEMSELVES OUT OF THE SNARE OF THE DEVIL, WHO ARE TAKEN CAPTIVE BY HIM AT HIS WILL.”
v23. “FOR I PERCEIVE THAT THOU ART IN THE GALL OF BITTERNESS, AND in THE BOND OF INIQUITY.”
Peter uses some pretty strong words to tell Simon of his spiritual condition doesn’t he? The word translated “GALL” here does in fact mean gall, bile, possibly the bitterest substance known to mankind. The same word in the original language is used by the Hebrew writer as well and translated bitterness:
Hebrews 12:14-15 “FOLLOW PEACE WITH ALL men, AND HOLINESS, WITHOUT WHICH NO MAN SHALL SEE THE LORD: LOOKING DILIGENTLY LEST ANY MAN FAIL OF THE GRACE OF GOD; LEST ANY ROOT OF BITTERNESS SPRINGING UP TROUBLE you, AND THEREBY MANY BE DEFILED.”
v24. “THEN ANSWERED SIMON, AND SAID, PRAY YE TO THE LORD FOR ME, THAT NONE OF THESE THINGS WHICH YE HAVE SPOKEN COME UPON ME.”
It didn’t take Simon long to figure out he had a problem did it? He also didn’t have any problem asking for help either did he? He wants Peter to pray for him, is praying for someone something new? A couple of examples:
Exodus 8:8 “THEN PHAROAH CALLED FOR MOSES AND AARON, AND SAID, ENTREAT THE LORD, THAT HE MAY TAKE AWAY THE FROGS FROM ME, AND FROM MY PEOPLE; AND I WILL LET THE PEOPLE GO, THAT THEY MAY DO SACRIFICE TO THE LORD.”
I Kings 13:6 “AND THE KING ANSWERED AND SAID UNTO THE MAN OF GOD, ENTREAT NOW THE FACE OF THE LORD THY GOD, AND PRAY FOR ME, THAT MY HAND MAY BE RESTORED ME AGAIN. AND THE MAN OF GOD BESOUGHT THE LORD, AND THE KING’S HAND WAS RESTORED HIM AGAIN AND BECAME AS it was BEFORE.”
Could that be the reason we’re told today?
James
v25. “AND THEY, WHEN THEY HAD TESTIFIED AND
PREACHED THE WORD OF THE LORD, RETURNED TO
The
apostles had sent Peter and John down to
Read Acts 8:26-40
v26. “AND THE ANGEL OF THE LORD SPAKE UNTO PHILIP,
SAYING, ARISE, AND GO TOWARD THE SOUTH UNTO THE WAY
THAT GOETH DOWN FROM
We now turn
from the short account of the gospel being introduced to the Samaritans to the
introduction of the gospel into another part of the world,
v27. “AND HE AROSE AND WENT: AND BEHOLD, A MAN OF
And he arose and went. It didn’t take long for Philip to respond to God’s direction, did it? What the scripture records for us would indicate that there was no discussion, no hesitation, no, “I must finish things up here first”, or anything of that nature - he just went.
The
scripture says that was a man of
Zephaniah
This man was a man of great influence, he was the treasurer
of the Queen of that country, a position perhaps much the same as Joseph
enjoyed in the
v28. “WAS RETURNING, AND SITTING IN HIS CHARIOT READ ESAIAS THE PROPHET.”
He had been
to
v29. “THEN THE SPIRIT SAID UNTO PHILIP, GO NEAR, AND JOIN THYSELF TO THIS CHARIOT.”
This is the person to whom Philip has been sent. The Holy Spirit indicates that Philip is to join him in the chariot. Now why didn’t the Spirit just touch the heart of this man like some folks claim happens today and give him the understanding of God’s word that he was seeking? The same reason that God doesn’t do that today, because God doesn’t do that. The Spirit spoke to his chosen messenger instead and sent him to do the work needed.
v30. “AND PHILIP RAN THITHER TO him, AND HEARD HIM READ THE PROPHET ESAIAS, AND SAID, UNDERSTANDEST THOU WHAT THOU READEST?”
So Philip runs to the chariot and asks the eunuch, to you understand what you are reading?
v31. “AND HE SAID, HOW CAN I, EXCEPT SOME MAN SHOULD GUIDE ME? AND HE DESIRED PHILIP THAT HE WOULD COME UP AND SIT WITH HIM.”
The man of importance in the Ethiopian kingdom was also a man of humility wasn’t he? Most great men are. He understood fully the need for a teacher, he understood that he probably could not take the scripture that he was reading and understand what it was trying to tell him because it was prophecy, Isaiah writing of things that were to come. Consequently he invited Philip to join him in his chariot.
v32. “THE PLACE OF THE SCRIPTURE WHICH HE READ WAS THIS, HE WAS LED AS A SHEEP TO THE SLAUGHTER; AND LIKE A LAMB DUMB BEFORE HIS SHEARER, SO OPENED HE NOT HIS MOUTH:”
The eunuch was reading from:
Isaiah 53:7-8 “HE WAS OPPRESSED, AND HE WAS AFFLICTED, YET HE OPENED NOT HIS MOUTH: HE IS BROUGHT AS A LAMB TO THE SLAUGHTER, AND AS A SHEEP BEFORE HER SHEARERS IS DUMB, SO HE OPENETH NOT HIS MOUTH.”
Commentators
tell us that this quotation was taken from the Septuagint Version translated
into Greek and varies somewhat from the Hebrew text. So the eunuch is reading Isaiah from the
Greek translation done at
v33. “IN HIS HUMILIATION HIS JUDGMENT WAS TAKEN AWAY: AND WHO SHALL DECLARE HIS GENERATION? FOR HIS LIFE IS TAKEN FROM THE EARTH.”
Isaiah says that proper or fair judgment was to be taken away from Jesus. Jesus wasn’t crucified because of fair and reasonable judgment; Jesus was crucified because of hate and envy. Why? Because it was God’s plan to provide the perfect sacrifice for our sins. Jesus went through this judgment, the torment he was subjected to, the beatings, the mockings, and even his crucifixion without complaint, without murmuring, without protest. The question is asked who shall declare his generation? Who indeed will declare the death, burial and resurrection of Christ? His apostles, his disciples and the Christians who are his followers will; and the Holy Ghost that was sent to bear witness of him.
v34. “AND THE EUNUCH ANSWERED PHILIP, AND SAID, I PRAY THEE, OF WHOM SPEAKETH THE PROPHET THIS? OF HIMSELF, OR OF SOME OTHER MAN?”
The eunuch did not understand who the prophet was writing about so he asks Philip. The stage is set for the preacher to teach him.
v35. “THEN PHILIP OPENED HIS MOUTH, AND BEGAN AT THE SAME SCRIPTURE, AND PREACHED UNTO HIM JESUS.”
Apollo was another who when provided the opportunity did the same thing and his success is recorded for us:
Acts
Of course, Apollo, Philip and we have the Master Teacher as our example:
Luke 24:27 “AND BEGINNING AT MOSES AND ALL THE PROPHETS HE EXPOUNDED UNTO THEM IN ALL THE SCRIPTURES THE THINGS CONCERNING HIMSELF.”
v36. “AND AS THEY WENT ON their WAY, THEY CAME UNTO A CERTAIN WATER: AND THE EUNUCH SAID, SEE, here is WATER; WHAT DOTH HINDER ME TO BE BAPTIZED?”
The eunuch
continued on his way with Philip teaching him as they went. I think that we can safely assume that
they’ve traveled for some time. It would
take time to teach someone about Jesus who had never heard about him
before. The scripture says that they
came to a “CERTAIN WATER”. Now this is a
desert highway that would not have water just anywhere near it in many places. But being the road between
The eunuch asks the famous question, here is water, why can’t I be baptized? Now we’re told that Philip preached unto him Jesus, how did he know about baptism? Because, contrary to the teaching of many denominations and some of our denominationally minded brethren; preaching faith, repentance and the necessity of baptism is part of preaching Jesus.
v37. “AND PHILIP SAID, IF THOU BELIEVEST WITH ALL THINE HEART, THOU MAYEST. AND HE ANSWERED AND SAID, I BELIEVE THAT JESUS CHRIST IS THE SON OF GOD.”
This is a verse of controversy. The KJV includes it; the ASV and RSV exclude it. I don’t know the history of this difference but apparently some of the manuscripts include it and some don’t. As such; it is a classic example of the confession that we make before being baptized into Jesus Christ today and stands as the source or example of how it should be done. It is not a commandment to confess Christ it is an example of a believer confessing Christ prior to baptism. Christ gave us the commandment, made known the necessity in Matthew 10:32
v38. “AND HE COMMANDED THE CHARIOT TO STAND TILL: AND THEY WENT DOWN BOTH INTO THE WATER, BOTH PHILIP AND THE EUNUCH; AND HE BAPTIZED HIM.”
The eunuch didn’t hesitate did he? He didn’t wait until he understood the word of God better. He didn’t wiffle waffle around about becoming a child of God. He simply commanded his driver to stop. He and Philip went down into the water and Philip immersed him. Simple isn’t it? But do people accept this example in its simplicity today? No they ignore it, they mock it, they deny that it is given by God as a pattern for our behavior and generally, outside the church at least, try to do everything else but the simple act of this converted traveler.
v39. “AND WHEN THEY WERE COME UP OUT OF THE WATER, THE SPIRIT OF THE LORD CAUGHT AWAY PHILIP, THAT THE EUNUCH SAW HIM NO MORE: AND HE WENT ON HIS WAY REJOICING.”
Philip’s job was done. He has been sent to lead this man to Christ, he converted him, he was baptized and God no longer had a need for Philip to be there. Philip had to walk to get to the eunuch or at least if he didn’t we’re not told that. But when the time comes for him to leave the Spirit, spirits him away if you’ll forgive the play on words. The eunuch isn’t concerned about that is he? No, he just goes on his way rejoicing because he how has his sins forgiven for the first time in his life. He knows that he is saved, just as we can all know that we are saved of we have obeyed God’s commandments.
v40. “BUT PHILIP WAS FOUND AT AZOTUS: AND PASSING
THROUGH THE PREACHED IN ALL THE CITIES, TILL HE CAME TO
What is the
city of
Acts 21:8 “AND THE NEXT day WE THAT WERE OF PAUL’S COMPANY DEPARTED, AND CAME INTO CAESAREA: AND WE ENTERED INTO THE HOUSE OF PHILIP THE EVANGELIST, WHICH WAS one OF THE SEVEN; AND ABODE WITH HIM.”