What Harm Is There In It?
By
Many well-Intentioned people do not understand our objection to celebrating Christmas as Christ’s birthday. They say, “What harm could there be in helping people to remember Christ’s birth anyway?” It is a good question, and worthy of a response. Maybe these answers will help.
It is without scriptural basis.
The birth of Jesus Is factually presented in Scripture as is the rest of
the Gospel story (Luke 2). The religion of Christ is a Holy Spirit -
revealed religion (John
It teaches many fables about the Lord’s birth. The Bible does not teach much of the commonly
held notions of the popular legend surrounding the Christmas celebration. Pictures and nativity scenes and plays often
depict the little baby in a manger surrounded by the shepherds and the three
wise men bringing gifts. However, a
close reading of the inspired accounts of the Savior’s birth would indicate
that the shepherds visited Jesus at the manger (Luke 2-11, 12, 16), but
that the wise men visited the child much later when Joseph and Mary were in a house (Matthew 2:11, no longer was the baby in a “manger,” from the Greek
word phate, meaning a stable, or perhaps a feeding place under the open sky, Arndt
and Gingrich, pg. 862). The visit of the
wise men (from the Greek magi; men of
learning, often priests, well-versed in philosophy, medicine, and natural science)
was much later than that of the shepherds. The star appeared in the east at the time of
His birth and led the men (from the Mesopotamian valley, or
It encourages a yearly remembrance of Jesus. Many substitute the annual festival of
Christ’s birth for the daily service
which He demands (Luke
There is nothing wrong with keeping the secular elements of Christmas which are without religious significance (non-religious decorations, festive gatherings, exchanging gifts, family time, etc.), but we should avoid those religious aspects of the holiday that are without scriptural warrant.